Pleural fluid analysis

Light’s Criteria Calculator for Pleural Effusion

Calculate all three Light’s criteria to classify pleural fluid as an exudative or transudative pattern, with optional serum–pleural gradients for possible pseudoexudates.

All three criteria Pseudoexudate context Sources reviewed August 2026

Educational clinical decision support. Light’s criteria classify fluid as an exudative or transudative pattern; they do not diagnose the cause, determine whether thoracentesis is safe, or replace pleural-fluid pH and urgent clinical assessment when infection is suspected.

Paired serum + pleural-fluid analysis

Classify an effusion with all three Light’s criteria

Use serum and pleural samples obtained at the same clinical time whenever possible. Enter the laboratory-specific serum LDH upper limit—not the measured serum LDH—in the ULN field.

Required values

Protein and LDH

Optional pseudoexudate context

Serum–pleural albumin gradient

Enter both albumin values if a transudative cause—especially heart failure after diuresis or hepatic hydrothorax—is clinically suspected despite an exudative Light’s classification.

Calculated locally in your browserNo laboratory data uploadedBuilt for pulmonary workflows

The rule

An exudate meets at least one criterion

The criteria are intentionally sensitive. A single positive result classifies the effusion as exudative, but the result must be interpreted alongside the pretest clinical picture and subsequent diagnostic workup.

1

Pleural protein ÷ serum protein > 0.50

2

Pleural LDH ÷ serum LDH > 0.60

3

Pleural LDH > two-thirds of the serum LDH laboratory ULN

PatternCommon mechanismsRepresentative causes
TransudativeAltered systemic hydrostatic or oncotic pressureHeart failure, cirrhosis, hypoalbuminemia, nephrotic syndrome
ExudativeLocal pleural inflammation, vascular permeability, or impaired lymphatic drainageMalignancy, pleural infection, pulmonary embolism, autoimmune pleuritis

Important limitation

When an exudate may be a pseudoexudate

Diuresis can concentrate pleural protein and LDH, causing an effusion from heart failure to cross an exudative threshold. When the overall clinical picture strongly favors a transudative cause, gradients may help—but they should not erase an exudative result or exclude a second process.

Preferred when available

Serum − pleural albumin >1.2 g/dL

Secondary option

Serum − pleural protein >3.1 g/dL

What Light’s criteria do not answer

The classification does not identify malignancy, infection, tuberculosis, chylothorax, hemothorax, or pulmonary embolism. Those questions require targeted fluid studies, imaging, and clinical reasoning.

Suspected pleural infection is time-sensitive

When parapneumonic effusion or empyema is suspected, frank pus, pleural-fluid pH, glucose, LDH, microbiology, imaging, and the patient’s clinical condition guide drainage decisions. Light’s classification is not a substitute.

Frequently asked questions

Light’s criteria and pleural-fluid interpretation

What are the three Light’s criteria?

Pleural fluid is classified as exudative when any one of the following is present: pleural-to-serum protein ratio greater than 0.5, pleural-to-serum LDH ratio greater than 0.6, or pleural LDH greater than two-thirds of the laboratory upper limit of normal for serum LDH.

Is an effusion exudative if only one criterion is positive?

Yes. Light’s framework requires only one positive criterion. The number of positive criteria does not identify the cause or measure disease severity.

What is a pseudoexudate?

This term commonly describes a clinically transudative effusion—often related to heart failure after diuresis—that meets Light’s exudative criteria because protein and LDH have become concentrated. A coexisting exudative process must still be considered.

How are serum–pleural gradients interpreted?

When a transudate is strongly suspected but Light’s criteria indicate an exudate, a serum-to-pleural albumin gradient greater than 1.2 g/dL may support a misclassified transudate. If albumin is unavailable, a serum-to-pleural protein gradient greater than 3.1 g/dL can provide secondary context.

Does Light’s criteria diagnose pleural infection or cancer?

No. It separates exudative from transudative patterns. Diagnosis requires the clinical presentation, imaging, cell differential, pH, glucose, microbiology, cytology, and targeted investigations.

Should serum and pleural samples be collected together?

Paired samples obtained at the same clinical time are preferred because both ratios compare pleural-fluid values with serum values.